Payday Loans Payday Loans


Freedom and Capitalism: A Brief Note

October 9th, 2011

I saw a bumper sticker, blue and white with the little Obama logo, that read: “I’ll keep my guns and freedom, and you can keep the change.” I despise what the Right has done with the word freedom. It almost seems a dirty word, yet the concept is close to my heart. So it was with Karl Marx. It sucks that the existential crisis I have been in for the last ten years was being theorized about since at least the mid-nineteenth century. And today, protesters are occupying Wall Street for security in a system that doesn’t work and has never worked:

Capitalism seems different [than feudalism] because people are in theory free to work for themselves or for others as they choose. Yet most workers have as little control over their lives as feudal serfs. This is not because they have chosen badly. Nor is it because of the physical limits of our resources and technology. It is because the cumulative effect of countless individual choices is a society that no one—not even the capitalists—has chosen. Where those who hold the liberal conception of freedom would say we are free because we are not subject to deliberate interference by other humans, Marx says we are not free because we do not control our own society.

Economic relations appear to us to be blind natural forces. We do not see them as restricting our freedom—and indeed on the liberal conception of freedom they do not restrict our freedom, since they are not the result of deliberate human interference. Marx himself is quite explicit that the capitalist is not individually responsible for the economic relations of his society, but is controlled by these relations as much as the workers are.

Peter Singer, Marx: A Very Short Introduction, p. 91-92.

This “cumulative effect of countless individual choices” is the playground of ideology—a sort of organized societal schizophrenia. Ideology is full of contradictions, giving the media plenty of ground to call the protesters a bunch of idiots who don’t know what’s good for them, or at best don’t know exactly what they want. It’s obvious that things are not right; it’s too bad that it takes a crisis in the middle class to see it, because by the time it gets to that point, the problems all seem hopelessly obscured. Not to mention the fact that the lower classes have been struggling so long, they don’t even notice anything’s different.


May 23rd, 2010

I get inspired by a space that is limiting. The way records are made right now is that the number of options is so great that people have gotten into this lack of commitment, of security, of confidence…  Twenty years ago it was, “We have one day to mix at this studio.”  You had one shot, and everyone had to be on his or her best game.  It almost makes me want to go back to analog tape, and not because it sounds better.  It’s not some analog versus digital bullshit.  How does something that has an unlimited track count and unlimited editing capabilities affect the energetic character of a person? How does it affect the performance?

- Ben Allen, interviewed in Tape Op no. 76, March/April 2010, p. 47


May 20th, 2010
Thoreau, and his many heirs among contemporary naturalists and radical environmentalists, assume that human culture is the problem, not the solution.  So they urge us to shed our anthropocentrism and learn to live among other species as equals.  This sounds like a fine, ecological idea, until you realize that the Earth would be even worse off if we started behaving any more like animals then we already do.  The survival strategy of most species is to extend their dominion as far and as brutally as they can, until they run up against an equally brutal natural limit that checks their progress.  Isn’t this exactly what we’ve been doing?

What sets us apart from other species is culture, and what is culture but forbearance?  Conscience, ethical choice, memory, discrimination: it is these very human and decidedly unecological faculties that offer the planet its last best hope.  It is true that, historically, we’ve concentrated on exercising these faculties in the human rather than the natural estate, but that doesn’t mean that they cannot be ecercised there.  Indeed, this is the work that now needs to be done: to bring more culture to our conduct in nature, not less.

- Michael Pollan, Second Nature, p. 114-115


April 27th, 2010
If you think of evolution as a three-and-a-half-billion-year-long laboratory experiment, and the gene pool as the store of information accumulated during the course of that experiment, you begin to appreciate that nature has far more extensive knowledge about her operations than we do.

  -Micheal Pollan, Second Nature, p. 51